This petition was dismissed for failure to have procedural representation on the date of hearing, thereby defaulting the application and disposing of the ancillary issue as well.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
05.12.2023 Item No. 04 BR
FMAT 2678 of 2005 With IA No. CAN 2 of 2009 (old No. CAN 3520 of 2009)
Nakibuddin Ahmed & Ors. -vs-
New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Nobody appears on behalf of either of the parties. Even on earlier occasions the appellant has not been represented nor accommodation was sought for.
Accordingly, FMAT 2678 of 2005 is dismissed for default. Consequently CAN 2 of 2009 (old No. CAN 3520 of 2009) is disposed of.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court for information.
Urgent xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned advocate for the parties on usual undertakings.
( Ajay Kumar Gupta , J. )
2
Nakibuddin Ahmed & Ors.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Ajay Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
