The High Court dismissed the appellant's FMA for non-removal of defects despite notice and peremptory orders. The connected application and any interim orders were also dismissed with the L.CR sent back.
Dismissal of the FMA, connected application, and vacating any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
62 16.02.2023
Ct-08
FMA 684 of 2017 with
I.A No. CAN 1 of 2016(Old CAN No. 996 of 2016)
Ratan Saha Vs.
ar
Smt. Sumita Saha & Ors.
The appellant is not represented, nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellant.
Inspite of having adequate notice and a peremptory order being passed for removal of defects, no attempt has been made by the appellant.
In view of the report of the Assistant Registrar dated 09.02.2023 it appears that the defects have not been removed in terms of the order dated 13.8.2021, the appeal stands dismissed for nonremoval of the defects.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, the connected application also stands dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
L.C.R, if arrived, be sent down to the
appropriate court.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
2
Ratan Saha
Smt. Sumita Saha
Uday Kumar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
