This court dismissed FMA 1474 of 2017 filed by Pramila Samanta against Haradhan Mondal for non-removal of defects after adequate notice. The appeal was terminated without substantive adjudication due to procedural lapses by the appellants. The interim order stands vacated.
The appeal stands dismissed for nonremoval of the defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item-68. 16-02-2023
sg Ct. 8
FMA 1474 of 2017
Pramila Samanta & Anr. Versus Haradhan Mondal & Anr.
The appellants are not represented, nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellants.
In spite of having adequate notice and a peremptory order being passed for removal of defects, no attempt has been made by appellants.
In view of the report of the Assistant Registrar dated 09.02.2023 that the defects have not been removed in terms of the order dated 16.05.2019, the appeal stands dismissed for nonremoval of the defects.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
L.C.R., if arrived, be sent down to the appropriate Court.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Pramila Samanta
Haradhan Mondal
Uday Kumar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
