The court disposed of a revisional application as infructuous because the petition was filed prior to a retrial, and the petitioner's subsequent appeal against conviction on retrial was still pending.
The revisional application and connected applications dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.08.2023 Serial no.4 Aloke Ct. No. 30
CRR 937 of 2020 With IA No. CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CRAN 3905 of 2020)
Shyamal Mukherjee Vs.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Santanu Deb Roy … for the petitioner
Mr. Swapan Banerjee Mr. Suman De
… for the State
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits a copy of the order. Let the copy be taken on record.
The petitioner in this case is the accused who has prayed for setting aside the order of retrial passed by the learned Sessions Court in a case of acquittal. Subsequently, retrial was conducted and the accused/petitioner has been found guilty. It is now submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused that an appeal against the said conviction on retrial being Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 2023 is pending before the learned Sessions Judge.
As the present revision was filed prior to the retrial, the same has now become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present revisonal application is disposed of as infructuous.
All connected applications, if any, stands disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let a copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court for compliance.
2
Learned counsel for the State to inform the status of this
case to the concerned authority.
(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)
Shyamal Mukherjee
State of West Bengal
Shampa Dutt
Paul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
