Revision application for quashing of FIR dismissed. The petitioner failed to appear in court despite repeated calls, leading to default dismissal of the revisional application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.08.2023
Sl. No.:19
Court No.30 BM
CRR 1006 of 2020
Arnab Mukherjee & Anr. Vs.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Manaranjan Mahata
… for the State The present revision is of the year 2019 praying for quashing of FIR and subsequent proceeding in connection with Dum Dum Police Station Case No.1137 of 2019 dated 16.12.2019 under Sections 498A/323/506/34 of IPC, being G.R No.7418 of 2019 now pending before the learned ACJM at Barrackpore.
Mr. Manaranjan Mahata, learned counsel for the State present in court is appointed to represent the State in this case. Let his appointment be regularised.
As none appears for the the petitioner in spite of repeated calls since the date of listing, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.
Application, if any, connected thereto stands disposed of.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let a copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court for compliance and to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the State to inform the status of this case to the concerned authority.
( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )
Arnab Mukherjee & Anr.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Shampa Dutt (Paul)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
