Petitioner sought dismissal of the case as it was no longer wanted to be pressed. Court dismissed the case accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.12.2023 Item No.2 BR
CRR 867 of 2017 with IA No.CRAN 3 of 2018 (Old No. CRAN 1795 of 2018)
In the matter of : Pushpita Nath & Ors.
Mr. Souvik Mitra …. for the petitioner
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the case any further. So he prays for dismissal of the case.
Accordingly, CRR 867 of 2017 is dismissed as not pressed. Consequently, CRAN 3 of 2018 (Old No. CRAN 1795 of 2018 is, thus, disposed of.
( Ajay Kumar Gupta , J. )
Pushpita Nath & Ors.
Ajay Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
