Sruti Kawtia Nee Chowdhury v. Ashis Kawtia
Case brief
What is this about?
BR CRR 2256 0f 2016 In the matter of :…
BR CRR 2256 0f 2016 In the matter of :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
12.12.2023 Item No. 34 BR
CRR 2256 0f 2016
In the matter of : Shruti Kawtia nee Chowdhury
Mr. N. P.Agarwal ….. for the State
No one appears on behalf of the
petitioner on call. Even on earlier occasions no one represented the petitioner. No accommodation has been sought for.
It is submitted on behalf of the opposite party/ husband that the matter has already been settled out of Court and the petitioner and the opposite party have filed an application under 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The said consented decree of divorce was also allowed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, 7th Court, Barasat, North 24-Parganas on 16.2.2018 in Matrimonial Suit No. 1701 of 2017. So, she is not interested to proceed with the case. The case may be dismissed.
Let CRR 2256 of 2016 is dismissed for default.
2
Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Court below for information.
Urgent xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned advocate for the parties on usual undertakings.
( Ajay Kumar Gupta , J. )
Shruti Kawtia
Mr. N. P. Agarwal
Ajay Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court