Criminal revision dismissed for default due to non-appearance by the petitioner. The order against the petitioner was not represented on earlier occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.12.2023 Sl.No. 30 Ct. 32 Amalranjan
CRR 837 of 2017
Anuradha Chakraborty
Vs. Bipul Chakraborty and anr.
Nobody appears on behalf of either of the parties on
call.
This is an application of 2017. The instant application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the order dated 09.11.2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate at Nabadwip, Nadia in M.R Case No. 52 of 2016 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
However, neither represented the petitioner on earlier two occasions, nor any accommodation sought for. Accordingly, the instant revisional application being CRR 837 of 2017 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let the order be communicated to the Ld. Court below for information.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties taking all legal formalities.
( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )
Anuradha Chakraborty
Bipul Chakraborty
Ajay Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
