The High Court dismissed the revisional application as infructuous because the petitioners had been discharged from the underlying criminal trial.
The revisional application CRR 2942 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.12.2023 Sl.No. 22 Ct. 32 Amalranjan
CRR 2942 of 2016
Mannan Jalan and ors.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal and anr.
Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee
Mr. Aniket Agarwal…………..for the opposite party no. 2
Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate for the opposite party no. 2 submits that the instant revisional application has become infructuous as the petitioners in the instant case have been discharged by the learned court below. He further submits that another revisional application is pending against the order of discharge of the petitioners. He also filed the order of discharge along with the supplementary affidavit on earlier occasion.
Considering the submission and upon perusal of the supplementary affidavit, it appears that the petitioners have been discharged from the proceedings being Case No. CS/0015817/2015 under Sections 465, 466, 467, 469, 471 and 120B of the IPC pending before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta.
Accordingly, the revisional application being CRR 2942 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous.
Liberty is granted to all parties to act in terms of the copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this court.
2
Department is directed to communicate this order to the learned trial court immediately for information.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied to the parties taking all legal formalities.
( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )
Mannan Jalan and ors.
The State of West Bengal
Ajay Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
