Appearing parties defaulted. The criminal revisional application, CRAN, and any interim order were dismissed and vacated respectively.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
53 28.08. 2023
Ct 237
rup
CRR 339 of 2018 IA NO: CRAN 1 of 2018 (Old No: CRAN 452 of 2018)
Sri Digbijoy Paramanick @ Raju Vs. Smt. Sonali Paramanick
From the record, it appears that on 08.06.2023 this court passed an order directing the petitioner to comply with the order dated 25th June, 2018 and fix the matter 19th June, 2023 and from then the matter is running in the list.
None appears on repeated calls.
Thus, the criminal revisional application stands dismissed for default.
CRAN application also stands dismissed.
The Interim order, if any, also stands vacated.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
Sri Digbijoy Paramanick @ Raju
Smt. Sonali Paramanick
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
