Single judge dismissed the criminal revisional application for default as the applicant failed to take steps after being granted liberty to file a limitation application. No substantive decision on merits was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50 28.08. 2023
CRR 306 of 2018
Ct 237
rup
Sandip Parui Vs.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
From the record, it appears that liberty was granted to file application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act by the order dated 01.02.2018 and then no steps have been taken on behalf of the petitioner.
Thus, the criminal revisional application stands dismissed for default.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandip Parui
State of West Bengal
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
