Allowed

Naresh Kumar Sureka & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Calcutta HC28 Nov 2023CRR/1613/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Calcutta allowed a joint compromise application filed by the parties. Disputes arising from a commercial transaction, leading to proceedings under Section 320 IPC, were settled via a settlement agreement. Consequently, the criminal proceedings were quashed and the revisional application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings under Section 320 IPC are quashed; the revisional application and connected applications are disposed of; interim orders are vacated.

Naresh Kumar Sureka & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr. — Corruption | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

78 28.11.2023 Court No.237 pg.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

¶3

CRR 1613 of 2016 with

¶4

IA No. CRAN 6 of 2018 (CRAN 3329 of 2018) (Application not in the file) with CRAN 7 of 2023

¶5

Naresh Kumar Sureka & Ors. Vs.

¶6

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

¶7

Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra

¶8

… For the petitioners

¶9

Ms. Jyoti Singh

¶10

… For the opposite party no.2

¶11

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the parties to this revisional application filed one joint compromise application under Section 320(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer for passing necessary order pursuant to the compromise between the parties.

¶12

This revisional application originally filed with a prayer for quashing the proceeding in connection with Hare Street Police Station Case No.575 dated 8^th October, 2014 under Sections 406/418/420/465/468/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code pending before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta. Dispute between the parties arose during commercial transaction and after investigation of the case, charge sheet was also submitted. In the meantime, both the parties to this case

¶13

¶14

compromise all the disputes between the parties by executing a settlement agreement.

¶15

Given the facts and circumstances along with the submission advanced on behalf of the parties, I find no reason to stand in the way of compromise.

¶16

As a sequel, proceeding in connection with Hare Street Police Station Case No.575 dated 8^th October, 2014 under Sections 406/418/420/465/468/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to GR Case No.2275 of 2014 pending before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta, stands quashed.

¶17

The revisional application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶18

All connected applications are also disposed of.

¶19

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

¶20

Let a copy of this order be communicated forthwith to the Court of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta for information.

¶21

Criminal Section is directed to supply certified copy of this order, if applied for, upon compliance of necessary formalities.

¶22

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Naresh Kumar Sureka & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar Sureka & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Helgo Meyer Hamme Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Kanailal Chatterjee @ Chattopadhyay Vs State of West Bengal

Sarfaraj Akram @ Munshi MD Sarfaraz Akram Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Rohitash Kr Mittal Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Gurnendu Nath Chaudhuri Rep. by Asis Chaudhuri, P.A. Vs Dipankar Mahto

Erica Rustom Taraporevala Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.