In this criminal revisional application, the petitioner sought quashing of proceedings. The High Court observed that the underlying case had already resulted in an acquittal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as not pressed.
The revisional application was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44 23.11.2023 Court No.237 pg.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
CRR 440 of 2017
Kanailal Chatterjee @ Chattopadhyay Vs.
The State of West Bengal
Mr. Kunal Ganguly
… For the petitioner
Mr. Aniket Mitra
… For the State
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kanailal Chatterjee @ Chattopadhyay
The State of West Bengal
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
