The revisional applications (CRR 1516 of 2012 etc.) were disposed of as infructuous because the underlying complaint case was dismissed as uncontested by the lower court.
The revisional applications and connected applications were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.07.2023 34
cm
CRR 1516 of 2012 With CRAN 1/2012 (Old No. CRAN 3484/12) With CRAN 7/2016 (Old No. CRAN 3036/2016)
In the matter of : Stone India Limited & Ors.
…. for the petitioners.
Mr. Apalak Basu Mr. Cedric Fernandez
… for the petitioners.
Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala Mr. Pratick Bose
…. for the State.
The report filed by the S.I. Hare Street Police Station through the Office of the Learned Public Prosecutor, High Court, Calcutta dated 27.06.2023 stating that Complaint Case No. 5683 of 2010 pending before the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court, Calcutta has been dismissed on 01.09.2018 as uncontested
The instant revisional application and connected applications have become infructuous and accordingly disposed of.
Copy of the order be sent to the department as well as learned trial court for information.
Stone India Limited & Ors.
The State
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
