Single Judge dismissed a revision application against an order by a Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate concerning mutation of names in L.R.R.O.R., holding the dispute to be civil in nature. Both the petition and connected application were dismissed.
The instant revisional application along with connected application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.07.2023 9 cm
CRR 3725 of 2011 With CRAN 1/2015 (Old No. CRAN 1024/2015)
In the matter of : Abedin Ansari.
None appears for the parties.
The instant revisional application is filed being aggrieved against an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate, Purulia on 15.11.2011 in connection with Misc. Case No. 542 of 2011 under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In the meantime, the CRAN 1/2015 (Old No. CRAN 1024/2015) was filed for substitution. The dispute between the parties concerns mutation of names in the L.R.R.O.R. which is civil in nature.
Under such circumstances, the instant revisional application along with connected application is dismissed.
Copy of the order be sent to the trial court for necessary information.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revisional application against an order in mutation of names, which is civil in nature, is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abedin Ansari
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
