Single Bench rejected a bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC. The Court held that due to the gravity of the offence and completion of prosecution evidence, bail could not be granted, while directing the trial to be expedited within six months.
Bail application rejected; trial court directed to expedite trial within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.12.2023 Sl. No.33 akd [Rejected]
C. R. M. (DB) 4046 of 2023
In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 11.10.2023 in connection with Chakdaha Police Station Case No.53 of 2018 dated 12.02.2018 under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. (G.R. Case No.102 of 2018)
And
In Re: Ama Roy @ Kalu
… … Petitioner
Mr. Rajkumar Sain
Mr. Sandipan Maity
… … for the petitioner
Mr. Madhusudan Sur .. ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor
Mr. Manoranjan Mahata
… … for the State
due compliance.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in light of the completed prosecution evidence and six-year delay in custody.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ama Roy @ Kalu
The State
Gaurang Kanth
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
