The High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under Sections 302 and 439 CrPC, observing that circumstantial evidence requires trial assessment and noting the petitioner's long custody.
Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.12.2023 59 sdas allowed
CRM(DB) No. 4340 of 2023
In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 14 of 2019 dated 08.01.2019 under Sections 365/302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
And In Re : Manirul Islam ...… petitioner
Mr. Sagar Saha .…for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Banerjee Mr. Bitasok Banerjee
…. for the State
2
subject to conditions that petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under Sections 365/302/201/34 IPC when evidence is circumstantial.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Manirul Islam
State
Gaurang Kanth
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
