This discharge order directs the learned Sessions Judge to consider the petitioner's application for cancellation of bail at the earliest, preferably within 30 days, after giving both parties a hearing opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.07.2023. 60. Ct.No.28. as
C.R.M. (DB) 1734 of 2023
In Re: An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In the matter of : Manjura Khatun Sk.
… Petitioner. Mr. Malay Bhattacharyya, Mr. Subhrajyoti Ghosh. ….for the Petitioner. Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Mr. Suman De. …for the State. Mr. L. Vishal Kumar, Ms. Manaswita Mukherjee. ..for the Opposite Party No.2.
Petitioner was enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Judge. It is contended that opposite party/accused is threatening the petitioner. Similar relief has been sought before the Court granting bail.
Under such circumstances, we dispose of the application requesting the learned Sessions Judge to consider the application for cancellation at the earliest preferably within 30 days from the date of communication of this order after giving an opportunity of hearing to both the parties.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for cancellation of bail granted by the Sessions Judge should be disposed of by the High Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjura Khatun Sk.
Ajay Kumar Gupta
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
