Respondent sought cancellation of bail. Petitioner alleged threats by respondent. Court found allegations generic without specific particulars. Application for cancellation of bail dismissed.
The application for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no.2 was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.04.2023. 64. Ct.No.28. as
C.R.M. 657 of 2017
In Re: An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In the matter of : Aparajita Chakraborty.
… Petitioner.
Mr. Abhimanyu Banerjee.
…for the Petitioner.
A co-ordinate Bench of this Court enlarged the opposite party no.2 on bail subject to conditions. It is alleged opposite party no.2 threatened the petitioner and her husband to withdraw the case.
Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner.
Complaint lodged with regard to threats held out by the opposite party no.2 are generic. No specific particulars have been stated therein.
Hence, we are not inclined to cancel the bail granted to the opposite party no.2.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
It is open to the petitioner to re-agitate the issue in the event the trial is continuing and the opposite party no.2 indulges in any wrongful conduct in future.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for cancellation of bail should be allowed given allegations of threats against the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aparajita Chakraborty
Opposite party no.2
Ajay Kumar Gupta
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
