Allowed

Sukdeb Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC11 Apr 2023CRM (A)/1377/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC in a case under the Electricity Act. Relucting on compliance with the previous order, the court fixed bond conditions and reporting obligations before the Investigating Officer and the Court.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted upon bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions to appear before the Investigating Officer and the Court.

Sukdeb Mondal Vs State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

11.04.2023

¶2

C.R.M. (A) 1377 of 2023

¶3

Sl.5 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Court No.29 the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Marishda (AD) Police Station Case No. 16 of 2018 dated 07.02.2018 under (Allowed) Section 135(1)(a) of the Electricity Act 2003 read with Amendment Act, 2007.

¶4

And
In the matter of:Sukdeb Mondal	….petitioner.
Mr. Suman De	… for the petitioner.
Ms. Sutapa Banerjee	…for the State.
Mr. Aniket Mitra	… for the WBSEDCL.

¶5

Petitioner complied with the order dated March 31, 2023.

¶6

In view of such compliance and in view of the materials in the

¶7

case diary, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶8

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶9

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶10

¶11

C.R.M. (A) 1377 of 2023 is, thus, disposed of.

¶12

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶13

(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Sukdeb Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukdeb Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murshid Jahan@Dana and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Mansura Khatun and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Sakanta Saha Chowdhury Vs State of West Bengal

Pravas Meur Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Bapan Sarkar and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Sukumar Maiti Vs State of West Bengal