Allowed

Sukumar Maiti v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC11 Apr 2023CRM (A)/1362/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to Sri Sukumar Maiti in an FIR under the Electricity Act. The Single Judge allowed the application after the petitioner complied with previous directions and based on case diary materials, directing release upon bond and property conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed with a bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties, conditioned on reporting to the IO and appearance in Court.

Sukumar Maiti Vs State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

11.04.2023

¶2

Sl.4 Court No.29 (AD) (Allowed)

¶3

C.R.M. (A) 1362 of 2023

¶4

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Patashpur Police Station Case No. 68 of 2023 dated 26.02.2023 under Sections 135(1)(a)/135(1)(b) of the Electricity Act 2003 read with Amendment Act, 2007.

¶5

And

¶6

In the matter of: Sri Sukumar Maiti

¶7

Mr. Suman De	….petitioner. … for the petitioner.
Ms. Kum Kum Mitra
	…for the State.
Mr. Aniket Mitra	… for the WBSEDCL.

¶8

Petitioner complied with the order dated March 30, 2023.

¶9

In view of such compliance and in view of the materials in the

¶10

case diary, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶11

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶12

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶13

¶14

C.R.M. (A) 1362 of 2023 is, thus, disposed of.

¶15

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶16

(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Sukumar Maiti v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukumar Maiti v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murshid Jahan@Dana and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Mansura Khatun and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Sakanta Saha Chowdhury Vs State of West Bengal

Pravas Meur Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Bapan Sarkar and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Sukdeb Mondal Vs State of West Bengal