The appellant petitioned to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file afresh. The court permitted withdrawal on these terms, noting that the cause title required redaction of the victim's description to comply with the Indian Penal Code.
CRA (DB) 94 of 2023 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh and cause title redacted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
36 10.05.2023 CRA (DB) 94 of 2023 (AD) Court No.29 In Re.: A petition of appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In the matter of: - Subrata Chakraborty ...Appellant. Mr. Biswajit Manna … for the Appellant.
The learned Advocate appearing for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file afresh.
The descriptions of the victim as appearing in the cause title be redacted since it violates the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
As prayed for, CRA (DB) 94 of 2023 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC can be dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant
Whether the cause title must be redacted for victim particulars under the Indian Penal Code
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subrata Chakraborty
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
