Single-judge Application for Cancellation of Bail (S.C.B.) petition before a Division Bench challenging the grant of anticipatory bail to private opposite parties. The Bench found no material irregularity in the lower court's order.
Application for cancellation of anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27 08.05.2023 (AD) C.R.M. 2691 of 2019 Court No.29 In Re: - An application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. And In the matter of: - Mohammad Mursalim Sk ...petitioner. Mr. Manas Kumar Das … for the petitioner. The application is directed against an order dated February 15, 2019 by which the private opposite parties were granted anticipatory bail. The learned Judge considered the injury report of the injured and the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and found custodial interrogation of the private opposite parties was not necessary and, therefore, proceeded to grant anticipatory bail to the private opposite parties. We find no material irregularity in the grant of anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge. In such circumstances, we find no merit in the present application for cancellation. C.R.M. 2691 of 2019 is disposed of accordingly. (Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
2
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is material irregularity in the grant of anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge warranting its cancellation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Mursalim Sk
Private Opposite Parties
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
