Srikanta Bagdi v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal 18 of 2012 and CRAN 1 of 2012. No appearance to condonation application. Appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.
Criminal Appeal 18 of 2012 and CRAN 1 of 2012. No appearance to condonation application. Appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.08.2023 48 sdas
CRA 18 of 2012 with CRAN 1 of 2012 (Old CRAN 88 of 2012)
In Re : Srikantha Bagdi …… appellant
In Re : CRAN 1 of 2012 (Old CRAN 88 of 2012)
Nobody appears to move the application for condonation of delay. Accordingly, application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Consequentially criminal appeal being CRA 18 of 2012 is dismissed as barred by limitation.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal is maintainable beyond the limitation period without condonation of delay.
Srikantha Bagdi
Gaurang Kanth
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court