The court dismissed the criminal appeal (CRA 174 of 2011) as barred by limitation after finding it filed without condonation of delay due to nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.08.2023 47 sdas
CRA 174 of 2011 with CRAN 1 of 2011 (Old CRAN 718 of 2011)
In Re : Kalipada Bag …… appellant
Nobody appears to move the application for condonation of delay. Accordingly, application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Consequentially criminal appeal being CRA 174 of 2011 is dismissed as barred by limitation.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal under CRA 174 of 2011 was barred by limitation and thus unsustainable.
Kalipada Bag
Gaurang Kanth
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
