A contempt application (CPAN 841 of 2015) was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear and did not pray for any accommodation, indicating a loss of interest in the proceeding.
None. The contempt application was dismissed and the proceeding discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11 10.02.2023 rkd Ct.15
CPAN 841 of 2015 In W.P.A. 10467 of 2014 (IA NO: CAN 1/2017 (Old No: CAN 9648/2017)
Sri Manoshsa Malick
-vs-
Sri Ajoy Pratap Singh
The contempt application being CPAN 841 of 2015 is taken up pursuant to the order dated 5th January, 2023 for consideration.
At the time of call no one appears for the applicant and no accommodation is prayed for.
It appears that applicant has lost interest in the fate of the contempt application.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed.
The contempt proceeding stands
discharged.
Application, if any pending, also stands dismissed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Sri Manoshsa Malick
Sri Ajoy Pratap Singh
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
