in the event the plaintiff felt aggrieved with such assumption of management, he has no other alternative but to approach the State Government under Section 65(2) of the said Act challenging the correctness, legality or propriety of the decision of the Board. It is thus, contended that in view of the provisions of Section 65 (2) of the said Act a suit challenging such assumption of charge by the defendant-opposite party-Board is not maintainable before the Tribunal. Drawing attention to Section 65(3) of the said Act it is contended that under the said provision of law after assumption of charge of a Waqf Estate the Board is duty bound to furnish detailed report inclusive report of accounts to the State Government only and therefore, Learned Tribunal is equally justified in refusing the prayer of the plaintiff-petitioner to furnish accounts of the said Estate to him. It is further submitted that in course of trial of the said suit Learned Tribunal rightly came to a favorable conclusion in favour of the said Board with regard to its power and function in administering the said Waqf Estate under Section 32 of the said Act and thus, there cannot be any justification to interfere with the impugned judgement. Learned advocate for the said Board-opposite party thus, submits that it is a fit case for dismissal of the instant revisional application.
