Single Bench dismissed a revisional application under Article 227 challenging an order dismissing condonation of delay. The court quashed proceedings based on the petitioner's conduct indicating amicable settlement, directing no order on costs.
Application dismissed; no order as to costs. Copy of order sent down to the learned Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21 19.9.2023 Ct. 236 SB
C.O. 4056 of 2005
In the matter of : Smt. Kalo Khatik
2
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional application under Article 227 warranting challenge to the order dismissing condonation of delay remedy.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt. Kalo Khatik
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
