The High Court dismissed an Article 226 application challenging a Trial Court order in an eviction suit regarding substitution of parties and impleadment of legal heirs. The Court found no perversity or jurisdictional error.
Application under Article 226 dismissed; copy of order sent to Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23 19.9.2023 Ct. 236 SB
C.O. 1015 of 2008
In the matter of : Bijoy Krishna Basu & Ors.
2
application merits no further consideration and is dismissed along with application, if any.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of the Trial Court in permitting substitution and impleadment was perverse or committed jurisdictional error.
Whether revision against such an order in a partition/eviction suit merits interference.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Bijoy Krishna Basu & Ors.
Harendra Nath Basu & Ors.
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
