A single-paragraph order allowing the withdrawal of a writ application filed due to absence of a Presiding Officer in the Industrial Tribunal, dismissing the matter as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ application with liberty to proceed before the appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47 24.11.2022
sb Ct 550
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 9296 of 2020 With WPA 7760 of 2020
Coal India Limited Contractor’s Workers Union & Anr. Vs.
Coal India Limited & Ors.
Ms. Sumitra Das
… For the petitioners.
Ms. Madhuri Mistry Ms. Sanehita Roy barman
… For the respondents
Learned advocate representing the petitioners on instruction submits that since there was no Presiding Officer in the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata, the present writ application was filed. She seeks leave to withdraw aforesaid writ application with liberty to proceed before the appropriate authority.
In view thereof, let this matter be dismissed as withdrawn.
Let a copy of the instruction made over to the Court by the learned advocate for the petitioners be kept with the record.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Coal India Limited Contractor's Union & Anr.
Coal India Limited
Raja Basu Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
