Due to non-appearance of petitioner counsel, WPA 4950 of 2017 was dismissed for default and any interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BP Sl. 16 Court No. 550
WPA 4950 of 2017 M/s. Concast Ispat Ltd. & Anr. Vs. The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation & Ors.
Mr. Satyendra Agarwal ..for the respondent no.1
Records would reveal that on 9th November, 2022
none appeared for the parties.
Today at the time of call no one appears on behalf of the petitioners. No accommodation has been sought for though Mr. Agarwal representing the respondent no.1 is present in court.
In view thereof, let this matter be dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J. )
2
M/s. Concast Ispat Ltd.
The Employees' Provident Fund Organisation
Raja Basu Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
