Allowed

Adwaita Dinda v. the Second Appellate Authority and State Information Commission and Ors.

Calcutta HC22 Aug 2022WPA/9170/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge Writ Petition allowed by fixing the respondent number 4 to decide the pending first appellate appeal expeditiously and within September 30, 2022, before the State Chief Information Commission during a defunct office situation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to file (directed to be filed) the first appeal within forty eight days; otherwise, second appeal will be set aside.

Adwaita Dinda Vs the Second Appellate Authority and… — RTI and Transparency | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

AD-09 Ct No.09 22.08.2022 TN

WPA No. 9170 of 2022

Adwaita Dinda

Vs.

The Second Appellate Authority and State Chief Information Commission, West Bengal Information Commission and others

¶6

Mr. Sakya Maity, Mr. Subhas Jana

¶7

…. for the petitioner

¶8

Mr. Raja Saha,

¶9

Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee

¶10

…. for the West Bengal Information Commission

¶11

Liberty is granted to the learned Advocate-onrecord for the petitioner, on prayer, to amend the computer sheet annexed with the writ petition inasmuch correction of the classification is concerned.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner applied for information which was kept pending by the first authority, for which a first appeal had been preferred before the appropriate appellate authority, that is, the respondent no.4. Due to long pendency of the said first appeal, a second appeal has been preferred, which is also pending before the present respondent no.1.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, by handing over a Notification dated June 06,

¶14

¶15

2022, submits that the said office is at present defunct. As such, unless a new official is appointed, no direction could be carried out in the meantime.

¶16

However, in his usual fairness, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 suggests that the first appellate authority may, if the court so chooses, be directed to decide expeditiously the first appeal of the petitioner, which is pending before the first appellate authority, that is, the respondent no.4.

¶17

Accordingly, WPA No. 9170 of 2022 is disposed of by directing the respondent no.4, that is, the Secretary & Appellate Authority, Dept. of Health & Family Welfare, Swasthya Bhawan, Salt Lake, Kolkata, to decide on the appeal preferred on December 02, 2021, by way of the application annexed at page-23 (Annexure P-5) of the writ petition, as expeditiously as possible and upon hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law, preferably within September 30, 2022.

¶18

There will be no order as to costs.

¶19

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

¶20

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)

Adwaita Dinda v. the Second Appellate Authority and State Information Commission and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adwaita Dinda v. the Second Appellate Authority and State Information Commission and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramachandran and Anr. Vs the State

Suchitra Kumar Mondal Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Achiya Khatun (Molla) Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sachindra Nath Biswas and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Bansidhar Majhi Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Pandey Vs the Dist Magistrate,Hooghly and Ors.