Disposed
Achiya Khatun (Molla) v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Calcutta HCWPA/9338/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2022 (AK) 09 W.P.A 9338 of 2022 Achiya…
What the court decided
AI extract
2022 (AK) 09 W.P.A 9338 of 2022 Achiya…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18th August, 2022 (AK) 09
W.P.A 9338 of 2022
Achiya Khatun (Molla)
Vs. The State of West Bengal and others
Mr. Tushar Kanti Mukherjee …for the petitioner.
Mrs. Subhra Nag
Affidavit-of-service filed in court today be kept on record.
The innocuous prayer of the petitioner is that a representation given by the petitioner (Annexure-P1 at page-10 of the writ petition) has not yet been considered by the respondent authorities and may be considered.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, WPA 9338 of 2022 is disposed of by directing respondent no.1 to consider and decide on the representation given by the petitioner (annexed at page-10 of the present writ petition) upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six weeks from date.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Achiya Khatun (Molla)
The State of West Bengal
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court