This order dismisses Writ Petition Appeal No. 8208 of 2022 filed by Santimoy Datta Gupta for default as the petitioner remained unrepresented and sought no adjournment.
Writ petition dismissed for default; costs; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
05 18.07.2022
sb Ct 23
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 8208 of 2022
Santimoy Datta Gupta
Vs.
Union Bank of India & Ors.
Mr. Ranjay De,
Mr. Basabjit Banerjee … For the respondents.
The petitioner remains unrepresented at the time of call. No adjournment is sought for. No one has also applied on behalf of the petitioner to join in the virtual mode.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
There will, however, be no order as to costs.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
Santimoy Datta Gupta
Union Bank of India
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
