Dismissed

Sanjoy Bhowmick v. West Bengal Transport Corporation Limited and Ors.

Calcutta HC18 Jul 2022WPA/12919/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal filed by an employee seeking regularisation of service to West Bengal Transport Corporation Limited. The single judge directed the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's pending representation within four months via a reasoned order after providing an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to dispose of the petitioner's representation by a reasoned order after giving an opportunity of hearing within four months.

Sanjoy Bhowmick Vs West Bengal Transport… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

18.07.2022 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ML-103 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION (PP) APPELLATE SIDE

¶2

WPA 12919 of 2022 Sanjoy Bhowmick Vs. West Bengal Transport Corporation Limited & Ors. Mr. Upendra Roy, Ms. Kanchan Roy ….for the petitioner. Ms. Deblina chattaraj …for WBTC. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

¶3

The petitioner was appointed as the Ticket Seller-cum-Conductor in Calcutta Tramways Company (1978) Limited (in shot “CTC”) now known as West Bengal Transport Corporation Limited (n short “WBTC”). The petitioner says that most of the employees appointed in the same rank that of the petitioner has been regularised since 2010. The petitioner is seeking regularisation of his service. The petitioner says that he has made a representation on 17^th March, 2022. This representation is not yet disposed of.

¶4

The matter either can be heard after inviting affidavit from the respondents or by directing the representation of the petitioner to be considered by the competent authority.

¶5

After hearing the parties and considering the materials on record, I find that to get the views of CTC now known as WBTC so far as the petitioner’s regularisation is concerned, it will be convenient to

¶6

¶7

direct the respondent no.2 to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 17^th March, 2022 by a reasoned order after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing within a period of four months from date. The reasoned order that may be passed shall be immediately communicated to the petitioner.

¶8

The respondent no.2 shall deal with all the issues raised in the representation and shall not be influenced in any manner by any observation made in this order while dealing with the petitioner’s representation since I have not entered into the merits of the petitioner’s case.

¶9

The parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order without insisting upon production of a certified copy thereof.

¶10

Nothing further remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition. The same is disposed of accordingly without any order as to costs.

¶11

Since I have not called for any affidavits, allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have not been admitted.

¶12

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities.

¶13

( Arindam Mukherjee, J. )

Sanjoy Bhowmick v. West Bengal Transport Corporation Limited and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjoy Bhowmick v. West Bengal Transport Corporation Limited and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajib Bose Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Pallabi Chakraborty Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Monisha Vs Union of India and Ors.

Santimoy Datta Gupta Vs Union Bank of India and Others

Sonali Sen Vs Union of India and Ors.

Smt Pushpa Bouri Alias Puspa Bauri Vs M/S Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. and Ors.