In defense at the return of the WPA 4901 of 2022, the High Court of Calcutta dismissed the petition as it stands voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner. All connected applications and interim orders were disposed of accordingly.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.05.2022 sayandeep Sl. No. 10 Ct. No. 05
WPA 4901 of 2022
Sreya Acharjee
-Versus-
The Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya Mr. Raju Bhattacharyya Md. Alauddin Mondal Mr. Surath Choudhury
….. for the petitioner
Mr. Debapriya Gupta
….. for the respondent No. 1
Mr. Indranil Roy Mr. Sunit Kr. Roy
…. for the N.M.C.
Mr. D.N. Maiti
…. For the WBUHS
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner hands up a signed letter from the petitioner dated 10.05.2022 wherein the petitioner has instructed counsel to withdraw the writ petition. The said document is kept on record.
WPA 4901 of 2022 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, shall stands vacated and all
connected applications are disposed of accordingly.
(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
Sreya Acharjee
The Union of India
N.M.C.
WBUHS
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
