The court disposed of a petition seeking provisional admission for a petition with benchmark disability. It directed the IPGME&R to submit a report on the petitioner's mental position and allowed parties to reappear after filing the report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.05.2022 sayandeep Sl. No. 11 Ct. No. 05
WPA 3587 of 2022
Sreya Acharjee -Versus-
The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya Mr. Alauddin Mondal Mr. Raju Bhattacharyya Mr. Afrin Nahar Mandal …… for the petitioner Ms. Paramita Pal ….. for the State Mr. Indranil Roy Mr. Sunit Kr. Roy …. for the N.M.C Mr. D.N. Maiti ….. for WBUHS
This is a second time that adjournment is prayed for on behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the State. Since orders have been passed in other matters which are identical in nature directing the IPGME&R to file a Report to the Registrar General of this Court, a similar direction may be given to IPGME&R in the present case. As recorded in the order dated 24th March, 2022, the petitioner, who otherwise satisfies the benchmark disability criterion of 40 per cent and above, shall be given provisional admission for the quota subject to the mental position of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
2
petitioner is already attending classes in the concerned College.
WPA 3587 of 2022 is disposed of in terms of the above.
The parties shall be at liberty of mentioning for appropriate orders after filing of the Report by IPGME&R.
(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the IPGME&R to submit a medical report on the petitioner's mental condition given a prayer for adjournment.
Whether the petitioner qualifies for provisional admission subject to the outcome of the medical report.
Whether to dispose of the writ petition pending the receipt of the report from the IPGME&R.
Sreya Acharjee
The Union of India & Ors.
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
