The High Court dismissed the writ petition (WPA 4297 of 2022) as it was not pressed on behalf of the petitioner, who indicated via counsel to submit written instructions to that effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.08.2022 Ct. 21 D/L 3 ab
WPA 4297 of 2022
Laxmi Narayan Yadab -Vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Tanuja Basak
Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay
Mr. Subir Sanyal, Ms. S. Sarkar
… for the respondent nos. 5 & 6
Ms. Tanuja Basak, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that she has instruction from her client not to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly, WPA 4297 of 2022 is dismissed as
not pressed.
Let the written instruction from the petitioner be kept on records.
Kausik Chanda, J.)
Laxmi Narayan Yadab
The State of West Bengal
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
