Disposed

Talmi Mardi v. Union of India and Ors.

Calcutta HC13 Jul 2022WPA/3842/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge directed the Special Land Acquisition Officer to consider the petitioner's application for compensation regarding land acquired for the National Highway project and communicate the decision within one month.

What did the court decide?

The 7th respondent (Special Land Acquisition Officer) directed to consider the petition's application for compensation and communicate the decision within one month.

Talmi Mardi Vs Union of India and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

20 13.07.2022 Ct. No.10 b.das

¶2

WPA 3842 of 2022

¶3

Talmi Mardi Vs. Union of India & Ors.

¶4

Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta Mr. Niladri Saha …for the petitioner. Mr. Purusattam Basak …for the respondent No.1. Mr. Chandi Charan De Ms. Reshmi Rehman …for the State. Ms. Manika Roy …for the NHAI.

¶5

Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

¶6

It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the plot in question belonged to the father of the petitioner and the petitioner along with other co-sharers are in occupation of the same after demise of their predecessor-in-interest.

¶7

The plot was acquired by the respondent for the purpose of extension of National Highway No.34, but no compensation has been paid to the petitioner till date.

¶8

The petitioner submitted an application before the authority in this regard and the concerned authority, being the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Uttar Dinajpur by a notice dated 20^th December, 2021 requested the petitioner to attend a hearing scheduled on 22^nd December, 2021 at 12 noon.

¶9

¶10

The petitioner submits that despite attending the hearing no further communication was made to her in connection with the application made by her for payment of compensation.

¶11

It is submitted on behalf of the National Highway Authority of India that the authority has no role to pay herein as the compensation amount has been deposited by the authority before the concerned authority in 2018 and further compensation with regard to the structures and the left out structures have been deposited in 2020.

¶12

It is submitted on behalf of the State respondents that the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Uttar Dinajpur, the 7^th respondent herein be directed to issue a communication to the petitioner in respect of hearing held in connection with the application made by her.

¶13

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 7^th respondent to consider the application for payment of compensation made by the petitioner and communicate the decision taken by the authority to the petitioner within one month from the date of communication of this order.

¶14

With the above observations and directions this writ petition being WPA 3842 of 2022 is disposed of.

¶15

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶16

Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to be admitted.

¶17

¶18

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶19

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)

Talmi Mardi v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Talmi Mardi v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Odud Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Srimati Manna and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sutapa Bhandari and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Hazira Khatun Bibi Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Trideb Ranjan Maity Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sk. Ruhul Amin Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.