Writ petition filed by Sk. Ruhul Amin was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner withdrew the matter; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19 13.07.2022 Ct. No.10 b.das
WPA 3788 of 2022
Sk. Ruhul Amin Vs.
The State of W.B. & Ors.
Mahammad Mahmud Mr. B. Bhattacharya Ms. Pinki Das …for the petitioner.
Ms. Juin Dutta Chakraborty …for the Respondent Nos.5 to7.
Mr. Chandi Charan De Ms. Shima Adhikari Ms. Kakoli Naskar …for the State.
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition being WPA 3788 of 2022 is dismissed for non-prosecution.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
Sk. Ruhul Amin
The State of W.B.
Suvra Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
