Disposed

Sri Chandra Bhan Kajaria & Ors. v. the State of W.B.& Ors.

Calcutta HC15 Jul 2022WPA/3443/1996

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of three miscellaneous applications involving petitioners and the State of West Bengal. The court allowed prayers to substitute the names of legal heirs of deceased writ petitioners in the cause titles of pending writ petitions and directed the department to tag amended titles.

What did the court decide?

The court allowed the prayer to delete names of deceased petitioners and incorporate the names of their legal heirs in the cause title of the writ petitions.

Sri Chandra Bhan Kajaria & Ors. Vs the State of W.B.& Ors. — Calcutta HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Item 03.03. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA No. 2025 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION 12 & APPELLATE SIDE 13

¶2

Ct 551 rup

¶3

WPA 23644 of 2012 With IA NO: CAN 2 of 2017 (Old No. CAN 4261 of 2017) CAN 5 of 2025

¶4

Atmaram Kajaria & Ors. Vs

¶5

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

WPA 3443 of 1996 With

¶7

IA NO: CAN 10 of 2025

¶8

Sri Chandra Bhan Kajaria & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶9

Mrs. Usha Maity, Mr. Sakya Maiti, Mr. Gourav Kumar. … for the petitioners. Mr. Aridam Mandal, Mr. Arindam Ghosh. … for the State.

¶10

WPA 23644 of 2012

¶11

In Re: CAN 2 of 2017 (Old No. CAN 4261 of 2017)

¶12

This is an application for substitution of legal heirs of deceased writ petitioner No.6 and deceased writ petitioner No.8.

¶13

On perusal of the order dated 9.10.2018, it reveals that a Co-ordinate Bench while

¶14

¶15

disposing CAN 4397 of 2017 has allowed similar such prayer and thereby necessary amendments have been made by the department in the cause title of the instant writ petition by deleting the names of the deceased writ petitioner Nos. 6 and 8 and incorporating the names and particulars of the legal heirs of the said deceased writ petitioners. Such being position, CAN 2 of 2017 (Old No: CAN 4261 of 2017) has become infructuous and is disposed of.

¶16

Registry is directed not show the pendency of CAN 2 of 2017 (Old No: CAN 4261 of 2017) during the subsequent listing of this case.

¶17

In Re: CAN 5 of 2025

¶18

This is an application for substitution the names of the legal heirs of the deceased writ petitioner No.1 and writ petitioner No.2, particulars of whom have been mentioned at page No. 7 of the instant application i.e. at the cause tile as well as in paragraph 2 of the said application.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/State does not oppose the prayer. On perusal of the petition under consideration and after hearing the learned advocates for contending parties, this Court finds no

¶20

¶21

predicament in allowing the prayer made in the instant petition.

¶22

In view of such, the department is directed to delete the names of the deceased writ petitioner No.1 and writ petitioner No.2 from the cause title of the instant writ petition and in its place the names and particulars of the legal heirs of the deceased writ petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, particulars of whom have been mentioned in the cause title of the instant application at page No.7 as well as at paragraph 2 of the instant application, be incorporated.

¶23

By filing the self-same application, the writ petitioners have also prayed for deleting the name of substituted writ petitioner No. 6(a) that is Smt. Shakuntala Devi Kajaria and deceased writ petitioner No. 7Pawan Kumar Kajaria since their legal heirs and legal representatives are already on record.

¶24

Such prayer is also allowed.

¶25

Department is further directed to delete the name of substituted writ petitioner No.6(a) and writ petitioner No.7 from the cause title of the instant writ petition forthwith.

¶26

With the aforementioned observation, CAN 5 of 2025 is disposed of.

¶27

¶28

WPA 3443 of 1996

¶29

In Re: CAN 10 of 2025

¶30

This is an application for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased writ petitioner No. 1(i)Chandra Bhan Kajaria and deceased writ petitioner No. 4Atmaram Kajaria, particulars of whom have been mentioned in the cause title of the instant application i.e. at page No.7 of the instant application.

¶31

After hearing the learned counsel for the contending parties and on perusal of the application under consideration, this Court finds no predicament in allowing the prayer made in the instant writ petition.

¶32

In view of such, department is directed to delete the name of the deceased writ petitioner No. 1(i)Chandra Bhan Kajaria and deceased writ petitioner No. 4Atmaram Kajaria forthwith and to incorporate the names of legal heirs of the said two writ petitioners in the cause title of the instant writ petition as has been mentioned at page No.7 of the instant application as well as in paragraph 2 of the instant application.

¶33

By filing the instant petition, the writ

¶34

¶35

petitioners also prayed for deleting the name of deceased writ petitioner No.2(i) Pawan Kumar Kajaria and deceased writ petitioner No. 2(iii) (a) Smt. Shakuntala Devi Kajaria since their legal heirs and legal representatives are already on record.

¶36

Such prayer is also allowed.

¶37

In view of such, department is directed to delete the name of writ petitioner writ petitioner No.2(i)/ Pawan Kumar Kajaria and deceased writ petitioner No. 2(iii)a/ Smt. Shakuntala Devi Kajaria from the cause title of the instant writ petition forthwith.

¶38

17.Learned advocate on record on behalf of the writ petitioner is hereby requested to file an amended cause title of the instant writ petition, preferably within a week from today in the department after serving a copy of the same to the learned advocate for the respondents.

¶39

18.Department is directed to tag such amended cause title at the top of the instant writ petition, if so filed.

¶40

With the aforementioned observation, CAN 10 of 2025 is disposed of.

¶41

20.Registry is directed not show the pendency of CAN 10 of 2025 during the subsequent listing

¶42

¶43

of this case

¶44

Let the matter be listed on March 27 of 2025

¶45

under the hearing ‘Writ Petition’.

¶46

(Partha Sarathi Sen J.)

Sri Chandra Bhan Kajaria & Ors. v. the State of W.B.& Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Chandra Bhan Kajaria & Ors. v. the State of W.B.& Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Partha Sarathi Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Arati Roy(Adhikary) Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Ananda Dutta Vs W.B.S.E.D.C.L. & Ors.

Tapan Kumar Chatterjee Vs State

Smt Ramdulari Mahato Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

State of Wb Vs Ganesh Das Ramgopal & Anr.