Tapan Kumar Chatterjee v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
None appeared in the first and second calls; the Civil Revision Reference and connected Application are dismissed for default.
None appeared in the first and second calls; the Civil Revision Reference and connected Application are dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
133 19.07 Ct 2022 21 AGM
CRR 2500 of 2006 CRAN 1/2007 (Old No. CRAN 1120/2007)
Tapan Kumar Chatterjee Versus State of West Bengal
No one appeared in the first call. In the second call
also none appears.
Accordingly, CRR 2500 of 2006 along with CRAN 1 of 2007 (Old No. CRAN 1120 of 2007) is dismissed for default.
( Kausik Chanda, J.)
Tapan Kumar Chatterjee
State of West Bengal
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court