The court held the writ petition became infructuous as the admission course was over during its pendency and disposed of the matter without adjudicating merits.
Disposed of W.P.A. No. 17055 of 2018 and CAN 1 of 2020 as the matter was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01 14.07. RK 2022 B Ct 21
W.P.A. 17055 of 2018 CAN 1 of 2020
Golam Hyder Absaruddin.
Vs
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Anindya Halder … for the petitioner
Mr. Swapan Kumar Datta, Mr. Tapas Kumar Dey.
… For the State.
This writ petition was disposed of on October 4, 2018. An appeal (MAT 1400 of 2018) was preferred. The Appeal Court set aside the said order and remanded this writ petition back for hearing afresh on exchange of affidavits.
It has been submitted by learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous since the course in which the petitioner sought admission, was over during the pendency of this writ petition.
In that view of the matter, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition. Accordingly, W.P.A No. 17055 of 2018 along with CAN 1 of 2020 is disposed of.
Let urgent certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities.
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
2
Golam Hyder Absaruddin
State of West Bengal
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
