Allowed

Shreeja Dey v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC14 Jul 2022WPA/15567/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioner, a student whose application for Semester-II exam failed to upload due to college technical defects, sought permission to appear. Single Judge directed University to permit appearance and issue admit card, noting non-fault of the student.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of; University directed to permit petitioner to write Semester-II examination and issue admit card.

Shreeja Dey Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

Up 14.07. p. 2022 1

¶2

RKB Ct 21

¶3

W.P.A. 15567 of 2022

¶4

Shreeja Dey. Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶5

Md. Sarwar Jahan, Md. Anisur Rahaman, Md. Maidul Islam Kayl… for the petitioner

¶6

Mr. Swapan Kumar Datta, Mr. Tapas Kumar Dey.

¶7

… For the State.

¶8

Mr. A. Majumdar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nitotpal Chatterjee, Mr. Satyaki Banerjee

¶9

… for the University of Calcutta.

¶10

Petitioner is a student of B.Sc. (Honours) in Psychology in Asutosh College under the University of Calcutta. She cleared her Semester-I Examination in the year 2022.

¶11

As per prevalent practice, for Semester-II, her application was to be uploaded by the College on the portal of the University through online.

¶12

The College submits that an attempt was made to upload her application within the schedule fixed by the University, but due to technical defects, her application was not processed by the University. Only on July 8, 2022, on the University portal a list of candidates including the name of the petitioner, whose applications were kept pending, was published. Since there was no extension of time to upload the application, the College

¶13

¶14

could not submit the application again.

¶15

In such circumstances, College wrote a letter on July 13, 2022, requesting the University to permit the petitioner to sit in the Semester-II Examination.

¶16

Mr. Majumdar learned senior advocate representing the University on instruction submits that there was no attempt by the College to upload the form of the petitioner on or before 8^th July 2022.

¶17

Be that as it may, it is a question of the future of a student and the stand of the College makes it very clear that at least the petitioner was not at fault.

¶18

In that view of the matter, without going into any controversy, I dispose of the writ application directing the University to permit the petitioner to write the Semester-II examination. The University will make an endeavour to issue the admit card in favour of the petitioner manually in course of this day. If it is not possible for the University to issue admit card in course of this day, the University will permit her to appear in the examination and issue admit card subsequently.

¶19

The College will deposit the necessary fees, if not already paid, in favour of the University through the State Bank of India within seven days from date.

¶20

The controller of the examination of the University shall co-operate with the College and the petitioner to ensure that the petitioner can appear in the examination without further complication.

¶21

¶22

Accordingly, W.P.A. 15567 of 2022 stands

¶23

disposed of.

¶24

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this

¶25

Court.

¶26

(Kausik Chanda, J.)

Shreeja Dey v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shreeja Dey v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kabari Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Nani Gopal Barik Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Prabir Das Vs Vice Chancellor, Vidyasagar University and Anr.

Abdul Aziz Vs State of West Bengal

Til Ltd. & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Golam Hyder Absaruddin Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.