Petitioner appeared in-person and unrepresented at the second call; writ petition was dismissed for default without any adjournment or virtual mode application.
Writ petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16 08.07.2022
sb Ct23
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 1443 of 2020 (Assigned)
Dr. Atanu Chattopadhyay & Anr. Vs. Shivakant Prasad
The Hon’ble Justice of High Court at Calcutta & Ors.
It appears from the previous orders that the petitioner no.1 is appearing in-person and is representing all the petitioners. The petitioner no.1 remains unrepresented even at the second call. No adjournment is sought for. No one has also applied to conduct the matter through virtual mode.
In such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
Dr. Atanu Chattopadhyay & Anr.
Shivakant Prasad
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
