The High Court at Calcutta disposed of a contempt application. The applicant submitted that the order in WPA 11353 of 2021 was complied with during the pendency of the application and declined to proceed further. The court disposed of the contempt application without any further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA 08.07.2022 SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION sb Ct 23 APPELLATE SIDE
CPAN 97 of 2022 In WPA 11353 of 2021
Sumit Kumar Singh Vs.
Ms. Saheli Ghosh & Ors.
Mr. Dipendu Sarkar, Mr. Kaushal Kumar
… For the applicant/petitioner.
Ms. Aparna Banerjee … For the alleged contemnors/respondents.
It is submitted on behalf of the applicant/petitioner that the order dated 1st September, 2021, passed in WPA 11353 of 2021, being the subject matter of the contempt application has been complied with during the pendency of the contempt application. The applicant/petitioner, therefor, does not intend to proceed further with the contempt petition. The written instruction received by the learned advocate for the petitioner from his client in this regard is made over to the Court, and is retained with the records.
The contempt application is disposed of without any further order.
(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
Sumit Kumar Singh
Ms. Saheli Ghosh & Ors.
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
