The Single Judge dismissed the appeal SAT 3215 of 2005 for want of prosecution after the petitioner informed the court they did not wish to proceed further. The connected case CAN 1 of 2005 was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.11.2022 2 Ct. no. 652 sb
SAT 3215 of 2005 With CAN 1 of 2005 (Old CAN 8751 of 2005)
Gangadhar Saha & Ors. Vs. The Collector of Birbhum, Suri & Ors.
Mr. Sourav Prasanna Mukherjee …for the Appellant
Mr. Dinabondhu Dan
…for the Respondent no. 4
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that his client does not want to proceed further with the present appeal.
Accordingly, SAT 3215 of 2005 is dismissed for want of prosecution. The written communication submitted by the petitioner, is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid dismissal order, CAN 1 of 2005 is also disposed of.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Gangadhar Saha & Ors.
The Collector of Birbhum, Suri & Ors.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
