Disposed

Pranab Bose v. Binod Kumar

Calcutta HC15 Dec 2022FMAT/471/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil dispute regarding unpaid goods price, the High Court appointed a Special Officer to verify payment of Rs. 3.97 lakhs within a week. The interim order stands if paid and goods delivered; otherwise, it is vacated. The underlying suit is expedited accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Special Officer to verify payment of Rs. 3.97 lakhs within a week; interim order retained conditionally.

Pranab Bose Vs Binod Kumar — Service and Employment | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

4 15.12.2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

F.M.A.T. 471 of 2022 With CAN 1 of 2022

Pranab Bose

Vs.

Binod Kumar

Mr. Arif Ali Mr. Santu Nandy … For the Appellant.

¶8

Mr. Sayan Datta Ms. T. Bag … For the Respondent.

¶9

Re: CAN 1 of 2022

¶10

The appellant before us is the buyer of some goods from the respondent.

¶11

The dispute between them is with regard to the price. The learned court below has granted an order of injunction restraining the respondent/seller from transferring the goods to any party.

¶12

S.D.

¶13

Learned advocate for the appellant buyer admits before us today that Rs.3.97 lakhs is payable as unpaid price for the goods. However, he adds that because of the delay the goods are no longer required by him. He required those goods to carry out a contract with the Air Port Authority of India which could not be performed due to lack of these goods.

¶14

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that if that amount is received, his client would deliver the goods to the appellant.

¶16

We appoint Smt. Monimala Dey Basu, Advocate Bar Association Room No. 1 as a Special Officer at a remuneration 600 gms. to be shared equally by the parties to see whether the said sum of Rs.3.97 lakhs is paid by the appellant to the respondent within a week from date and to ensure that upon receipt of such payment the said goods are delivered to the appellant. The Special Officer shall file a short report before the learned court below.

¶17

On receipt of the report confirming completion of the above transaction, the court shall proceed to record that the interim applications before it would stand disposed of and concurrently pass direction for expeditious hearing of the suit, after vacating the interim order.

¶18

In case the appellant defaults in making payment the interim order of the learned court below shall forthwith stand vacated. The learned court below shall only pass direction for early hearing of the suit.

¶19

If the Special Officer finds that the appellant is willing to pay but the respondent is not in a position to deliver the goods, she shall record it in her report and the interim order passed by the learned court below will

¶20

¶21

continue, the interim applications would be disposed of and the suit expedited.

¶22

The above order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the suit.

¶23

With these directions the appeal and the connected application (CAN 1 of 2022) are disposed of.

¶24

I.P. Mukerji, J.)

¶25

(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)

¶26

Pranab Bose v. Binod Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pranab Bose v. Binod Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kr. Ghosh Vs Monotosh Ghosh

Sasankar Kundu Vs Sudhirranjan Biswas

Ashalata Pal Since Deceased Rep by Legal Heirs Kripamoy Pal and Ors. Vs Munshi Nurul Islam

Sk Riyazuddin @ Rony Mukherjee Vs State of West Bengal

Md. Rafiqul Islam Mistry Vs Moresalim Mistry and Ors.

Najrul Sekh Vs Jelehar Begum and Anr.