Court dismissed the First Appeals Memorandum over default due to non-appearance of the appellant despite respondent's presence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.03.2022
Court No.32 rpan/ 06
F.M.A. 1886 of 2015
Sri Jaspal Singh – Versus – CESC Ltd. & Others
Mr. Madhusudan Saha Ray, Mr. Debanjan Mukherji
… for the CESC/Respondent Nos.1-5.
No one appears on behalf of the appellant and no accommodation has been sought for though the learned advocate appearing for the respondent nos.15 is present. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for default.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Sugato Majumdar
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
