The appeal in FA 151 of 2010 was dismissed as it had been settled out of court and the appellants did not wish to proceed further. The accompanying application CAN 8 of 2022 was disposed of.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. The interim order was vacated. Application CAN 8 of 2022 was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 23.03.2022 Ct. No. 32 rrc
In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side
FA 151 of 2010 CAN 7/2017 (Old No. CAN 8140/2017) with CAN 8/2022
Sachindra Nath Hazra & Ors. Vs. M/S. Patton Ltd.
Mr. Purnasish Gupta Mr. Jayanta Mukherjee Ms. Marry Datta …..For the appellants
Mr. Tapash Kumar Sinha Mr. Subir Sabud Mr. Samirul Sardar ….For the respondent no. 1
Mr. Gupta, learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the matter has been settled out of Court and as such, the appellants do not want to proceed with the present appeal any further.
Mr. Sinha, learned advocate enters appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 1.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for nonprosecution and interim order, if any, is vacated.
The application, being CAN 8 of 2022 is disposed of.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Sachindra Nath Hazra & Ors.
M/S. Patton Ltd.
Sugato Majumdar
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
